An analysis of the different sources of knowledge from philosophy point of view

So any non-redundant addition to the JTB theory will leave the Gettier problem unsolved. In the case of the second sentence, the answer is that one knows that it is true by understanding the meanings of the words it contains.

This much, certainly, seems beyond dispute. Much of the twentieth-century literature on the analysis of knowledge took the JTB analysis as its starting-point. It could be argued that, in one's own personal experiences with testimonial sources, one has accumulated a long track record that can be taken as a sign of reliability.

We take our perceptual faculties to be reliable. Socrates says that it seems that both knowledge and true opinion can guide action. For example, in the Investment problem, the investor might wish to distribute the assets among a mixture of the choices in such a way to optimize the portfolio's return.

In a longer video of a billiards break, the future is the end in which the balls are no longer in a nicely ordered triangle. Dependence Coherentism Whenever one is justified in believing a proposition p1, one's justification for believing p1 depends on justification one has for believing some further propositions, p1, p2, … pn.

The Sources of Knowledge

Deism is unparsimonious, because it cannot answer the question of why there is God rather than not God. A mystic believes what he feels.

Compared with perception, introspection appears to have a special status. Hindu philosophers of the six schools developed systems of epistemology pramana and investigated topics such as metaphysics, ethics, psychology gunahermeneutics and soteriology within the framework of the Vedic knowledge, while presenting a diverse collection of interpretations.

An alternative to a state of affairs or proposition p is any state of affairs or proposition that is incompatible with p. It became something of a convenient fiction to suppose that this analysis was widely accepted throughout much of the history of philosophy. Methodological Options As our discussion so far makes clear, one standard way of evaluating attempted analyses of knowledge has given a central role to testing it against intuitions against cases.

The phenomena alleged include: The doctor makes a thorough examination of you and prescribes certain medicines. External In contemporary epistemology, there has been an extensive debate on whether justification is internal or external.

An event is itself a change and time is no more than an ordering of these changes. The following definition captures this thought: Criteria of truth Whether someone's belief is true is not a prerequisite for its belief.

Instinct When an ant crawls on your right arm, the left hand automatically moves towards the right arm to drive the ant away. Decision making under risk is presented in the context of decision analysis using different decision criteria for public and private decisions based on decision criteria, type, and quality of available information together with risk assessment.

Fideisms Judaism is the Semitic monotheistic fideist religion based on the Old Testament's ( BCE) rules for the worship of Yahweh by his chosen people, the children of Abraham's son Isaac (c BCE).

The Analysis of Knowledge

Zoroastrianism is the Persian monotheistic fideist religion founded by Zarathustra (cc BCE) and which teaches that good must be chosen over evil in order to achieve salvation. An Analysis of the Different Sources of Knowledge from Philosophy Point of View PAGES 2.

WORDS 1, View Full Essay. More essays like this: knowledge, philosophy, empiricism. Not sure what I'd do without @Kibin - Alfredo Alvarez, student @ Miami University. Exactly what I needed. THE FOUR SOURCES OF KNOWLEDGE By SRI SWAMI SIVANANDA.

Inspiration, revelation, insight, intuition, ecstasy, divine sight and the supreme, blissful state are the seven planes of knowledge.

This article identifies the sources from which one acquires knowledge or justified belief.


It distinguishes the “four standard basic sources”: perception, memory, consciousness, and reason. A basic source yields knowledge or justified belief without positive dependence on another source. This article distinguishes each of the above as a basic source of knowledge.

Epistemology, the philosophical study of the nature, origin, and limits of human term is derived from the Greek epistēmē (“knowledge”) and logos (“reason”), and accordingly the field is sometimes referred to as the theory of knowledge.

Epistemology has a long history within Western philosophy, beginning with the ancient Greeks and continuing to the present.

Point of view (philosophy) An analysis of the different sources of knowledge from philosophy point of view
Rated 5/5 based on 35 review
Human Knowledge: Foundations and Limits